Animation of gold spinning Earth   National CSI       Animation of gold spinning Earth

Counter Street Gangs Intelligence

Consulting Solutions Inc.   

Badge Preview Badge Preview

Specializing in Domestic Terrorism


823 W. Park Avenue, Suite 161

Ocean, NJ 07712

(732) 922-4525 or (732) 922-4514


Home About Us CEO Greetings Program Summary Why Choose Us? Who Can Benefit From Training Volunteer Job Program FAQ Regions Feedback Contents Search Contacts Fees  

Hit Counter

Violence In The CommunityWe are the National CSI consulting and training specialist. We are a National and International consulting firm addressing timely issues. We specialize in Cultural Diversity, Violent Street Gangs, Domestic Terrorist, Youth Violence, Weapons on Campus, Bullying, Youth and community motivation.  We are often requested to address: community concerns. Our Clients are: Law Enforcement, Educators, Parole, Probation, Corrections, Community Organizations, Social Service Groups, Senior Citizens, Business Community, Concerned Youth, Faith-Based Organizations

Federal CSI 2042930-03            NJ CSI  CC  021770116-791-695                  Del CSI  - 1738524


[Under Construction]



Violence in the Community


While bullies, gangs, weapons, and substance abuse all contribute to the fear experienced by many of today's students, violence in America's neighborhoods and communities cannot be overlooked. Notwithstanding the sometimes unfounded and over generalized fear and apprehension about violence among children and adults, often fueled by the media, violence in America is a legitimate concern for everyone. Likewise, research and statistics regarding juvenile victimization cannot be entirely discounted as mere media sensationalism.

These are the voices of mothers living in dangerous neighborhoods:
  • I worry about my kids being molested, my house being burglarized, my oldest boy being shot.
  • Young men are selling drugs; we are innocent bystanders being bothered as we walk by.
  • There's fighting, shooting or cutting someone up outside the house all the time.
  • Out there is a jungle; innocent people get killed.

These are the voices of their children:

  • A man was lying on the street - I thought he was dead.
  • I'm afraid of being mistaken for someone else and shot at. I'll be a victim by just being there.
  • If someone is shooting, you might get the bullet even if it wasn't meant for you.
  • (Selected narratives from 160 mothers. Linares et al, in press)

What is community violence?

Most urban children, by the time they enter high school, have seen the use of weapons, guns or other acts of violence against people in their neighborhood or school. Community violence (CV) refers to exposure, as a witness or through actual experience, to acts of interpersonal violence perpetrated by individuals who are not intimately related to the victim. In contrast to community violence, domestic violence refers to acts of interpersonal violence between adult intimate partners.

In communities with high rates of community violence, many families experience chronic stress and worry. Parents attribute their concerns to both local crimes such as sexual assault, burglary, use of weapons, muggings, the sounds of bullet shots, as well as to social disorder issues such as the presence of graffiti, teen gangs, drugs, and racial divisions.

Exposure to community violence is particularly prevalent in poor inner-city neighborhoods. Children in these neighborhoods are at increased risk of exposure to community violence as compared to children residing in less economically distressed suburban areas.

In addition to studying random violent acts by strangers, researchers are now studying common verbal and non-verbal aggressive acts performed by children against other children or adults in their own community. For example, children are commonly bullied or victimized in verbally aggressive ways by older children as they walk to school, ride the school bus, or play in the park. These acts were originally considered innocent playfulness and not thought of as community violence. They are now, however, becoming of great concern to parents, educators and community leaders and are being investigated as possible precursors of more serious instances of community violence.

How does community violence affect children?

Children may be adversely affected regardless of whether they are victims or witnesses. For example, children are exposed to community violence when they witness a stranger in the street, a casual acquaintance from their neighborhood, or another student at their school, physically assaulting another person for the purpose of robbing him, settling a fight, venting anger, or making a threatening statement. Children are victims of community violence when they are the subject of a physical attack, or a threat of a physical attack, with or without a weapon, by anyone who is not in their intimate circle; e.g. someone other than a parent, caregiver, friend, or other individual living in the house.

Past research has documented that exposure to community violence may have enduring consequences on children's development, beginning in the pre-school years and continuing through adolescence. The research has demonstrated that children who witness community violence are likely to develop a view of the world that is hostile and dangerous. In addition, children in inner-city neighborhoods with high violent crime rates are also likely to be exposed to domestic violence in their own homes. Thus poor children residing in high crime areas are at double jeopardy: they are highly vulnerable for being victimized by different forms of interpersonal violence. Research has documented that children who are exposed to multiple forms of violence are at more risk of developing psychological sequelae than those exposed to only single or isolated violent events (either at home or in the community).

As a result of continued exposure to violence children may distrust adults and fear neighbors in their community. Their feelings of safety and confidence in adults may erode or diminish. Reactions may take several forms. Some children may become anxious, fearful or withdrawn, symptoms that are referred to as internalizing problems, or taking fears inward. On the other hand, children who witness violence may believe that the use of violence is justified and shows they are strong and powerful. They may learn to use violence to attain their wishes, or to identify with the aggressor, as a way to solve interpersonal conflict with the adult world or with their peers. These children show externalizing problems, that is, their fears may be expressed outward.

Children who witness acts of interpersonal violence as random or that targets bystanders are at risk of developing a cluster of psychological symptoms related to posttraumatic stress. This can include avoidance of painful memories while at the same time re-experiencing the traumatic event (through repetitive play or 'flashbacks' of the trauma). Traumatized children have fewer resources to deal with current developmental challenges, such as performing well in school or making and keeping friends. Although they are not fully aware of their preoccupation with the past, children may have difficulty concentrating on the 'here and now'' because their emotional energy is devoted to avoiding the past and fighting the negative memories. It is important to remember, however, that after the initial shock and fear many children exposed to community violence may not develop symptoms related to posttraumatic stress and that in some children symptoms may develop only later in life.

In general, the research shows that children are at greater risk for negative psychological effects, such as fear, distress or acting-out aggression if:

  • they are victims
  • they are exposed to chronic or multiple events, rather than a single isolated event
  • their mothers show distress in reacting to the same violent events
  • they lack the social support of other understanding adults.

Prevention and intervention

Past research on the intergenerational cycle of violence indicates that adults who were traumatized as children are more likely to commit crimes at a later age. To avoid this repetition, it is important to provide intervention at an early age to children who are exposed to or are victims of community violence.

The goals of primary prevention of youth violence, particularly during early childhood, are to help children:

  • develop pro-social ways to deal with everyday frustrations and peer conflict
  • learn problem-solving skills
  • practice non-violent negotiation strategies

Intervention programs vary. They can take place at the level of:

  • The child, particularly the preschooler who has difficulty talking about painful memories and needs the support of a caring adult to feel safe
  • The parents, by helping them develop appropriate techniques and enhancing family coping strategies
  • The community, by upgrading the services and the quality of the neighborhood

Intervention programs may vary by type:

  • Indicated programs focus on children already identified
  • Selective programs focus on high-risk children
  • Universal programs, often in specialized settings, are directed at all

By acknowledging the existence of community violence and understanding the added risk to children from domestic violence and other aggressive interactions, we can effectively promote a child's positive outlook on life.


For example, according to America's Children: Key National Indicators of Well-Being, a report released in 1997 by the Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics in Washington, D.C., almost 2.6 million youth ages 12 to 17 were victims of violent crimes in 1994. For this study, violent crimes were defined as simple and aggravated assault, rape, and robbery.43 The Federal Interagency Forum fosters coordination and collaboration in the collection and reporting of Federal data on children and families, drawing on numerous data sources.

In 1995, high school seniors reported the following types of victimization at school: having something stolen (more than 41 percent); having property deliberately damaged (26 percent); being threatened with a weapon (more than 15 percent); and being threatened without a weapon (more than 23 percent). Of these seniors, 4.7 percent had been injured with a weapon and 11.4 percent had been injured without a weapon.44

Many young people, aware of the dangers that exist within their communities and schools, feel compelled to make changes in their lifestyles. Louis Harris and Associates, Inc., conducted a survey for NCPC and NICEL, Between Hope and Fear: Teens Speak Out on Crime and the Community. Survey results were obtained from interviews of a nationally representative sample of more than 2,000 students in grades 7 through 12. The purpose of this 1995 survey was to focus on "the effect of the awareness and fear of violence and crime on young people and the loss of freedom that results."45

Of the students interviewed, 29 percent said that they worried about being victimized in a drive-by shooting, and 46 percent had made at least one change in daily routines because of concerns about personal safety and crime and violence in their communities. Following is a list of changes made in daily routines:

Bullet Changed friends (22 percent).
Bullet Avoided particular parks or playgrounds (20 percent).
Bullet Changed the way they went to or from school (13 percent).
Bullet Carried a weapon (e.g., bat, club, knife, gun) to protect themselves (12 percent).
Bullet Got lower grades in school than they think they otherwise would have (12 percent).
Bullet Stayed home from school or cut class (11 percent).
Bullet Found someone to protect them (10 percent).
Bullet Stopped attending a particular activity or sport (10 percent).

Approximately 1 in 8 students changed the way they went to and from school and more than 1 in 10 stayed home from school or cut class because of concerns about crime and violence in their communities. Such behavior reveals that many students fear for their personal safety while merely attempting to attend school.46

The roots of violence reach deep into society, tapping into such complex conditions as poverty, racism, joblessness, and hopelessness. Each epidemic of violence triggers "knee-jerk" calls for legislation and quick fixes. Often, however, little is done in the long run to change conditions that give rise to violent behaviors. It should be apparent that educators by themselves cannot carry out their mandate of educating children while trying to rid their schools and surrounding communities of violence. The National Association of School Boards of Education has pointed out, "A community problem necessitates community-wide solutions. What has been coined 'school violence' is nothing more than societal violence that has penetrated the schoolhouse walls."47

Community violence gives rise to subsets of associated violence that impact schools. The effects of campus violence can be devastating to both individual students and specific learning environments. Schools that lack effective discipline, respect for academic standards, and basic humanitarian values falter in their mission to provide safe and effective learning environments. Students who live in fear of violence, witness violent acts, or actually become victims of violence suffer an array of consequences ranging from personal injury and debilitating anxiety that interrupt the learning process to a pattern of absence and truancy that can lead to dropping out of school and delinquency. Such disassociation restricts individual options and limits the development of academic and life skills.

Safe Alternatives and Violence Education (SAVE) is a violence awareness education curriculum designed for 10- to 17-year-old students (and the parents of such students) who are found carrying a weapon on or near a school campus. The program was designed in 1993 in conjunction with a countywide effort to reduce weapon possession by youth, especially on school campuses. When a student is found in possession of a weapon on or near a school campus, the student and a parent are required to attend the SAVE program classes. Addressing the relationship between violence and the media, the realities of weapon possession, and the consequences of violence, the class is a one-time, 6-hour, interactive violence awareness curriculum offered year-round on Saturdays.

Referrals may be made by police agencies, juvenile court/probation officials, local schools, community agencies, or parents. Each SAVE class is staffed as needed by three police officers and a language translator. Program administration is handled by one full-time coordinator and a supervising sergeant. Several San Jose school districts use the SAVE program, either as an alternative to school expulsion or as a condition of suspension/expulsion.

In April 1997, the Center for Educational Planning, a division of the Santa Clara County Office of Education, published a program impact evaluation of SAVE. The evaluation reveals that almost 91 percent of the 372 students included in the study have had no subsequent weapons offenses after participating in the SAVE program. In addition, approximately 69 percent of the study participants have had no subsequent offenses of any type.

For more information, contact Suzan Stauffer, SAVE Coordinator, San Jose Police Department, 201 West Mission Street, San Jose, CA 95110, 408-277-4133.

Listed below are some of the types of legislation and collaborative programs undertaken by national, State, and local agencies working in partnership that are producing positive results in reestablishing schools as safe havens for learning:

Bullet Nearly all States have developed some sort of crime-free, weapon-free, or safe-school zone statute. Most States have defined the zones also to include school transportation and locations of school-sponsored functions.
Bullet The above statutes have given rise to zero-tolerance policies for such things as weapons and drugs. These policies are enforced by school districts and individual schools, often with support from local police forces or school-based resource officers.
Bullet Federal regulations established in 1994 mandate that all school districts set up programs to test school bus drivers for drug and alcohol use.48
Bullet Schools are forging partnerships with court officials, probation officers, and other youth-serving professionals to share information on and monitor students who have criminal records or who are in aftercare programs following their terms of incarceration in juvenile justice facilities.49
Bullet School districts are formulating crisis prevention/intervention policies and are directing individual schools to develop such policies and individual safe-school plans.
Bullet School districts, in response to local needs, have stepped up efforts to improve school security by installing security aids or devices and providing services such as:
Bullet Completing criminal background checks on teachers and school staff members before a work assignment is made.
Bullet Establishing Neighborhood Watch programs in areas near schools.
Bullet Recruiting parents to provide safe houses along school routes and to monitor "safe corridors" or walkways to and from school.
Bullet Enlisting parent volunteers to monitor hallways, cafeterias, playgrounds, and school walkways in order to increase visibility of responsible adults.
Bullet Creating block safety watch programs carried out by area residents at school bus stops as a crime deterrent for school children and area residents.
Bullet Fencing school grounds to secure campus perimeters.
Bullet Replacing bathroom doors with zigzag entrances, to make it easier to monitor sounds, and installing roll-down doors to secure bathrooms after hours.
Bullet Designating one main door entry to school, equipping exits with push bars, and locking all other doors to outside entry.
Bullet Installing bulletproof windows.
Bullet Equipping the school with closed-circuit video surveillance systems to reduce property crime such as break-ins, theft, vandalism, and assaults.
Bullet Designing landscaping to create an inviting appearance without offering a hiding place for trespassers or criminals.
Bullet Installing motion-sensitive lights to illuminate dark corners in hallways or on campus.
Bullet Mounting convex mirrors to monitor blind spots in school hallways.
Bullet Equipping classrooms with intercom systems connected to the central school office.
Bullet Issuing two-way radios to security patrols or campus staff members.
Bullet Purchasing cellular phones for use in crises or emergency situations.
Bullet Requiring photo identification badges for students, teachers, and staff and identification cards for visitors on campus.


The Adolescent Social Action Program (ASAP) at the University of New Mexico (UNM) uses peer resistance and decision making training to increase self-efficacy, social responsibility, and life skills. Youth participants engage in social action activities to address conditions that lead to high-risk behaviors, such as substance use and abuse, gangs, and violence. Preliminary research findings indicate a significant impact on the development of positive coping skills, the ability to influence others, and reduced rates in teen drinking behaviors.

For more than 14 years, ASAP has operated in more than 30 communities in New Mexico, including Native-American reservations and small, rural Hispanic communities. At the heart of ASAP is the work of Brazilian educator Paulo Freire, whose model emphasizes listening, dialog, and action. Small groups of students are taken on supervised visits to a local or regional hospital (three visits), a detention center (one visit), and the Metro court (one visit). The students interview the patients and inmates and listen to their stories. Then, using critical thinking strategies, they examine the consequences of the patients' and inmates' actions through dialogs led by trained graduate and undergraduate university facilitators and reflect on their own lives.

ASAP staff also conduct and develop local and national training for teachers, community groups, and health professionals on empowerment-based education, peer education, and working with youth.

For more information, contact Lily Dow, Adolescent Social Action Program, Family Practice Building, Third Floor, 2400 Tucker NE., Albuquerque, NM 87131-5241, 888-738-2940, 505-272-5532, 505-272-4494 (fax).

Creating Safer Schools

During the past decade in America, educational opportunity has gradually eroded in the Nation's schools. That opportunity has been undermined by violence and the fear of violence. Yet the Nation's basic precepts are intact: to provide educational opportunity, foster individual accomplishment in a diverse society, and preserve guaranteed rights and freedoms for all citizens.

Numerous prevention and intervention strategies have been outlined here, each developed to ensure that the Nation's schools are able to educate children in safe environments and that all youth have the opportunity to learn, grow, and mature as socially responsible citizens. Although these strategies are a good starting point, more such interventions are needed. Through the efforts of educators, law enforcement officials, and parents -- working in concert to implement these strategies and continuing to test new ones -- it is possible to reduce the violence found in today's schools and create safe schools in every community.


Parents and Schools Succeeding in Providing Organized Routes to Travel (PASSPORT) is a joint effort of the Visalia Unified School District, Visalia Police Department, parents, and community-based organizations. The California program provides supervised routes for students to use when traveling to and from school in high-crime or gang-oriented areas. Parents receive a letter and map that indicate recommended travel routes.

Parent volunteers stand in front of their homes and "just watch" during specified hours. Fights, intimidating behaviors, or unsafe activities are immediately reported to the nearest school or to other appropriate agencies. While on duty, parents wear badges bearing the school name and district logo; the back of the badge lists phone numbers for the school, the district student services office, confidential hotlines, and the gang suppression unit. Participating businesses along the route display bright yellow signs in their windows. These businesses have agreed to allow students to use the phone if they are threatened or intimidated. Students may remain at the business location until their parents pick them up.

School administrators and the safe school coordinator routinely monitor and walk the PASSPORT routes, and the police department regularly patrols the PASSPORT communities and routes. Media publicity about PASSPORT encourages all citizens to watch over schoolchildren to ensure their safe passage to and from school. The program depends on cooperative, volunteer efforts; actual dollar costs are minimal.

For more information, contact Ralph Lomeli, Safe Schools Coordinator, Visalia Unified School District, 315 East Acequia, Visalia, CA 93291, 209-730-7579.

Contact Information

If you have any questions please feel free to contact us at the below number. Also feel free to leave a detailed message.


(732) 922-4525 or  (732) 889-6670


(732) 922-4514

Postal address

823 West Park Avenuem, Suite 161, Ocean, New Jersey 07712

General Information:
Customer Support:
Webmaster: Cheryl Dye CO3GA@AOL.COM

Send    mail to with questions or comments about this site.
Copyright 1980 National CSI
Webmaster Cheryl Dye:

For our Disclaimer click

Last modified: 12/30/11